Hqplayer mac crack1/9/2023 So not entirely sure why your real world tests with HQPlayer suggest otherwise - I suppose those other benchmarks are testing more than pure cpu which is what HQPlayer is all about (vs memory bus etc)? One thing I will note is that your i9-9900K has a baseline frequency of 3.6Ghz whereas my i9-9980HK for above tests has a base frequency of 2.4Ghz.Ĭan your M1 do 1.411/1.HQPlayer Crack is a high-quality audio player available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X. But they also give similar results for your i9-9900K. They all suggest that the M1 is slightly faster in single core tests. Regarding performance of M1 core vs i9 9th gen - this was based purely on various benchmarks I have seen comparing M1 vs i9-9980HK, be it cinebench or geek bench or whatever. I got very similar results with 16/44.1k -> 1.411M. (Note that I have tried these tests multiple times and the results are consistent). What I don't understand is why auto multicore uses 2 additional cores than forced multicore. So, auto multicore used roughly 50% more CPU for a pretty small increase in performance. sample:Īuto multicore (grey) - took 2:38 to process file with 6 cores around 80% utilized and 2 partially. Multicore forced (checked) - took 3:11 to process file with 4 cores around 90% utilized and 2 partially utilized. No multicore - took 5:42 to process 4:55 file with two cores fully maxed. Again, cpu was i9-9980HK in MacBook Pro 16. The play time of the 24/192 file is 4:55. īelow are the performance numbers I got in each of 3 modes for a 24/192 file -> 1.536M using poly-sinc-gauss-xla + LNS15 output to the null device. So I am unclear on auto multicore vs forced multicore. Where does this figure come from? At least it is not the case comparing my M1 Mac Mini to my iMac with i9-9900K, where single core of 9900K is about 2x faster than single performance core on M1, under HQPlayer loads. Multicore DSP should be set to grayed (auto) which usually gives best overall performance in playback cases. So when I get a chance I’ll compare 5EC/ext3 with 7EC/ext2 to see which I prefer. No fans kicking in (that I can hear) on the M1 with 5EC and ext3. On my laptop, fans were running high (using TGpro) to keep temps just under 80C. I first started with my max settings on the MacBook Pro i7 (DSD256/5V2 256+fs/ext2) and CPU usage was about 25% on main cores, and zero on efficiency cores. The sound is so realistic it is scary! Thanks Jussi! For nX, I needed to set it to ext2 to get no stutters. 90% on the performance cores, and 60% on the efficiency cores. Wow! Jussi hit it out of the park with this on the M1. I transferred the HQP license, and now have it set to DSD256, with ASDM5EC, and ext3 for 1x. I set it up with a separate Apple ID so I could configure it for auto-login and screen sharing without worrying about security in case someone steals it. Basically, I turned off all the good Apple stuff, so that HQP is the only thing running on it (plus Activity Monitor for now so I can watch CPU load). It was easy to set up, and I’ll post my setup instructions when I get a chance. I’ve set up the M1 exclusively for HQP, with Roon on my 2012 rMBP, and ultraRendu NAA. ![]() I picked up a refurbished 8GB from Apple.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |